Legal Opinion

Bald Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 1, 1956No. Appeals, 57 to 64PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Bell,

We adopt the following excerpts from the very able opinion of the Auditing Judge, President Judge Boyle:

“The question presented in the audit of the two accounts now before the Court is whether the will of the testator bequeathed to the residuary remaindermen an interest which vested at the death of the testator or an interest contingent upon their surviving the testator’s aunt, Kate Bald, the life tenant of the residuary estate. . . .
“The testator died on June 23, 1951, aged 38 years. In his will he first bequeathed a number of legacies to named persons and then…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Britt EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Newlin EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Carstensen's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  4. Groninger's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  5. Neel's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Dinkey EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Hope EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Gregg v. GardnerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  4. England EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  5. Richley EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API