Legal Opinion
Cooey v. Strickland
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 9, 2008No. 08-4252Published
1Opinion of the Court 1
544 F.3d 588 (2008)
Richard COOEY, II, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Ted STRICKLAND, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 08-4252.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Submitted: October 7, 2008.
Decided and Filed: October 9, 2008.
ON BRIEF: Kelly L. Schneider, Gregory William Meyers, Kimberly S. Rigby, Ohio Public Defender's Office, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellant. Matthew A. Kanai, Charles L. Wille, Office of the Ohio Attorney General, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellee.
Before SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, and GILMAN, Circuit Judges.
2Opinion of the Court · SuhrheinrichSuhrheinrich, J., joined by Siler, J.,
GILMAN, J. (p. ___), delivered a separate concurring opinion.
OPINION
The state of Ohio has…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Baze v. ReesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- State v. CooeyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Richard Wade Cooey, II v. Ted Strickland, Governor Terry J. Collins, Director E.C. Voorhies, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Richard Cooey v. Ralph Coyle, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- State v. CooeyOhio Supreme Court · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.