Clegg v. Lyons, Harris & Brooks
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) While the partnership agreement provides for certain services to be rendered by the defendant to the partnership, for which he is to receive a specified-commission, and while it provides the terms and method for a possible dissolution, it expressly provides for the-purchase by the defendant of a specified interest in the partnership business, and that he shall share pro rata in the net profits of the enterprise, independently of the provision made for his personal services. The provision referred to is as follows: “ The parties of the first part hereby…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Sankey & Shorter v. Columbus Iron WorksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1871
- Floyd v. KicklighterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Dawson National Bank v. Ward & GurrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Thornton v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Buckner v. LeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1850
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Allgood v. FeckouryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
- Nellis & Co. v. Green & StallworthCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
- Sauls v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- McMillan v. GilmourCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- McMillan v. Shepard-Niles Crane & Hoist Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.