Legal Opinion

Sauls v. Scott

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 7, 1933No. 22410, 22411PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

The plaintiffs, four in number, entered into a written contract with the defendant which in substance provided that he should seek to secure options on and purchase timber and timber lands in Georgia; that the plaintiffs should furnish all necessary funds therefor, and should pay the expenses of the defendant, not to exceed $50 per week, while he was performing such services; that all losses arising from the transactions should be borne equally by the four plaintiffs, and all profits, after deducting *244all expenses, including the expenses of the defendant, should be divided equally among the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Allgood v. FeckouryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
  2. Clegg v. Lyons, Harris & BrooksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  3. Nellis & Co. v. Green & StallworthCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Elliott v. FloydCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  2. Hannifin v. WolpertCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  3. Beard v. OliverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  4. McCowen v. AldredCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  5. McMillan v. GilmourCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API