Leo v. Heller
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.
This is an action for damages for alienation of affections. Defendant appealed from a judgment for plaintiff which resulted after a trial before the court without a jury.
Defendant contends that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the judgment. A recapitulation of the testimony would add little to the jurisprudence of this state. Suffice it to say, we have read the tran*392script and believe that there was sufficient evidence to sustain the judgment.
Defendant, before trial, requested special findings. She now contends that the special findings of fact were insufficient to sustain the judgment…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rickard v. EllisOregon Supreme Court · 1962
- Larsen v. MartinOregon Supreme Court · 1943
- Weissman v. RussellOregon Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by3 opinions
- Oregon, State Highway Com'n v. DeLong Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
- Palmer v. Van Petten Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Palmer v. Van Petten Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973