Thornton v. State

OPINION

DAVIS, Commissioner.

Appeal is taken from a conviction for possession of over four ounces of marihuana. Punishment was assessed by the jury at five years.

The indictment alleged the offense occurred on or about June 5, 1974, and the record reflects that trial was on April 7, 1975.

Appellant in his second ground of error contends that “the argument of the prosecutor was prejudicial injecting harmful un-sworn testimony before the Jury.”

In light of the State’s response that the complained-of argument was invited, we look first to the following argument of appellant:

“Let me ask you this;…