King v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtRice, J.
Appellant was convicted of the offense of “Living in Adultery” with one Cordie Beck. Code 1923, § 319S.
A recital of the tendencies of the evidence would not be profitable. Suffice to say that we have carefully read the entire testimony and are of the opinion that, while it was sufficient, in the first instance, under the scintilla rule that prevails in this state (McMillan v. Aiken, 205 Ala. 35, 88 So. 135), to carry the issue of appellant’s guilt vel non to the jury, yet, upon appellant’s timely motion for a new trial, the verdict of the jury should have been set aside, in accordance with…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Amos v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- Stokes v. HintonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Yates v. BarnettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Phelps v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947
- Blair v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1939
- Blair v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1939
- Darby v. FullerAlabama Court of Appeals · 1935