Blair v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion
On Rehearing.
The further importunate insistence by appellant’s counsel to the effect that the motion for a new trial was presented in order that this court could review the ruling of the trial court thereon is not borne out; for, as stated, the motion for new trial, nor anything pertaining thereto, is not contained in the bill of exceptions in this case. The bill of exceptions is set out on pages 6 to 23 of the transcript. Appellant’s counsel appears to be confused, and regards the record proper, and the bill of exceptions, as being one and the same. We reiterate, the action of the court on…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Byrd v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1931
- Dukes v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Wells v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
- Riddle v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1932
- Conn v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.