Legal Opinion

Yates v. Barnett

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 24, 1927No. 5 Div. 971PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The case was tried upon counts 1 and 5. There was a jury and verdict for the plaintiff. The record proper— “judgment entry” — fails to show a specific ruling on demurrer, and we do not consider the assignment of errors predicated on ruling on demurrer to the complaint. Berger v. Dempster, 204 Ala. 305, 85 So. 392; Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co. v. Pemberton, 202 Ala. 55, 79 So. 393; Ala. Chemical Co. v. Niles, 156 Ala. 298, 47 So. 239.

To present for review the denial of the motion for a new trial, that ruling and exception thereto must be duly incorporated in the bill of exceptions. Stokes v.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Alexander v. WheelerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  3. J. H. Burton Sons Co. v. MaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  4. Feibelman v. Manchester Fire Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  5. Alabama Chemical Co. v. NilesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. J. C. Byram & Co. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. Watson v. Hardaway-Covington Cotton Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  3. King v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929
  4. Crawford v. Holmes & Waddell, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  5. Davis v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API