Yates v. Barnett
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The case was tried upon counts 1 and 5. There was a jury and verdict for the plaintiff. The record proper— “judgment entry” — fails to show a specific ruling on demurrer, and we do not consider the assignment of errors predicated on ruling on demurrer to the complaint. Berger v. Dempster, 204 Ala. 305, 85 So. 392; Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co. v. Pemberton, 202 Ala. 55, 79 So. 393; Ala. Chemical Co. v. Niles, 156 Ala. 298, 47 So. 239.
To present for review the denial of the motion for a new trial, that ruling and exception thereto must be duly incorporated in the bill of exceptions. Stokes v.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Alexander v. WheelerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
- J. H. Burton Sons Co. v. MaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Feibelman v. Manchester Fire Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1895
- Alabama Chemical Co. v. NilesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- J. C. Byram & Co. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Watson v. Hardaway-Covington Cotton Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- King v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929
- Crawford v. Holmes & Waddell, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1966
- Davis v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.