Legal Opinion

Rush v. City of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 25, 1987No. 85-3242PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE McMORROW

delivered the opinion of the court:

While plaintiff Patrick Williams (Williams) was being held by police as a suspect in a rape investigation, he was shot by the mother of the rape victim and sustained substantial personal injuries. He filed this action against the City of Chicago and certain officers of the Chicago police department (collectively the City) to recover damages for his injuries, alleging that the City’s failure to prevent the shooting or to protect him from it constituted both ordinary and wilful and wanton negligence. The trial court dismissed…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Thomas Byrd v. William P. BrishkeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
  2. Huey v. the Town of CiceroIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Dezort v. Village of HinsdaleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  4. Long v. SoderquistAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  5. Delasky v. Village of HinsdaleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Burdinie v. Village of Glendale HeightsIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Calloway v. KinkelaarIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Munizza v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  4. Trepachko v. Village of WesthavenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  5. Anthony v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API