Brookhaven Associates v. DeKalb County
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Benham, Judge.
Brookhaven Associates appeals from the judgment in a condemnation action after a jury found that $775,000 was just and adequate compensation for the property that DeKalb County took for the construction of a MARTA station. Brookhaven contends that the trial court erred in refusing to admit two pieces of evidence at trial. We disagree and affirm the judgment.
1. At trial, MARTA called its appraiser of the condemned property to testify about his findings. He had concluded that as of March 31, 1983, the date of condemnation, the fair market value of the property was $4.65 per square…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gibbons v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- Concept Capital Corp. v. DeKalb CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
- City of Atlanta v. WestCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Lockhart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- Jackson v. SpringfieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
3Cited by12 opinions
- Georgia Building Services, Inc. v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- City of Dalton v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- King Cotton, Ltd. v. PowersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Ekstedt v. CHARTER MEDICAL CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Williams v. LemonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.