Legal Opinion

Lockhart v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 6, 1984No. 67307PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Shulman, Presiding Judge.

Appellants Sammy Lockhart and Billy Smith were convicted of burglary. They allege in their appeal that the trial court erred in allowing the admission of previous inconsistent statements made by a prosecution witness, and in failing to grant a mistrial when the assistant district attorney made improper remarks to the jury during closing argument. Also, appellants contend that a prosecution witness was intimidated by alleged prosecutorial misconduct.

1. A third participant in the burglary, Dennis Smith, pled guilty and was called by the prosecution to testify against…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gibbons v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  2. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  3. Pethel v. WatersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
  4. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  5. Downs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brookhaven Associates v. DeKalb CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  2. Waldrup v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  3. Hubbard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  4. Willingham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  5. Waldrup v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API