Legal Opinion

Ray v. Stroud

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 22, 1942No. 4-6801PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin Smith, C. J.

The form of action is unlawful detainer. Stroud alleged that as owner he rented certain land to Bay, the -latter having taken possession in 1936. A similar contract for 1937 and 1938 was made at a later date. Bent for 1939 was not paid, although appellant held over. Bequisite notice to vacate was given.

The answer admitted the 1936 contract, but claimed there were no improvements on the property. It was agreed appellant should erect buildings not to exceed $100 in cost, and that Bay should retain possession until there had been reimbursement. Betention of 1936 rents did not suffice; therefore,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pickett v. FergusonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1885
  2. Burton v. GormanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
  3. Bettison v. BuddSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1856
  4. Eager v. Jonesboro, Lake City & Eastern Express Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  5. Smart v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sims v. PetreeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
  2. Billingsley v. LipscombSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  3. Kimble v. WilleyDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1951
  4. Wilson v. CampbellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  5. Hoch v. RatliffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API