Legal Opinion

Murray v. Ford Motor Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1941No. Docket No. 115, Calendar No. 41,149PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcAllister, J.

On April 4, 1929, plaintiff, while working for the Ford Motor Company as a machine repairer, suffered an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment. On May 13, 1929, the company specified the following as the nature of the injury, in its report to the department of labor and industry:

“Nature and cause of injury — Severe contusion dorsal surface metacarpal region right hand. Fracture styloid process of ulna. Employee was putting pattern on machine and the air valve was stiff and did not close properly and he caught his hand between patterns and machine. ’ ’

Plaintiff lost no…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. Pontiac Motor Car Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Goines v. Kelsey Hayes Wheel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Klum v. Lutes-Sinclair Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Hayward v. Kalamazoo Stove Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Aske v. W. E. Wood Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Tarnow v. Railway Express AgencyMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Pike v. City of WyomingMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Sotomayor v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Webber v. Steiger Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Ledward v. Public Welfare Board of FlintMichigan Supreme Court · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API