Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Hyman

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided February 11, 1964PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John D. Bennett, S.

This proceeding is brought to determine the validity and effect of the widow’s election to take against the provisions of the will (Surrogate’s Ct. Act, § 145-a; Decedent Estate Law, § 18).

The will leaves to the widow all personal and household effects and places one half of the residuary in trust for her benefit and the remaining one half in a separate trust for the testator’s infant daughter. Upon the widow’s death her trust fund follows the devolution provided for by the trust for the daughter.

Under section 18 of the Decedent Estate Law, a surviving spouse may elect…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of OsborneNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. In re the Estate of WittnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  3. In re MatthewsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  4. In re the Estate of BommerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  5. In Re the Estate of MatthewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1939

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of BauerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1967
  2. In re the Estate of KuncNew York Surrogate's Court · 1964
  3. In re the Estate of JafferNew York Surrogate's Court · 1969
  4. In re the Estate of PlimackNew York Surrogate's Court · 1973
  5. In re the Estate of ClarkNew York Surrogate's Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API