Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Plimack

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided January 3, 1973PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nathan B. Sobel, S.

Although Mr. Plimack died in 1971, his will admitted to probate was executed in 1942. As a consequence, in making provision for his wife by trust for life rather than by outright disposition, Mr. Plimack (or his draftsman) did not have the benefit of the many court decisions and statutory amendments since 1942 governing the right of election. The widow raises issues that her elective share trust is “ inadequate ”, “illusory” and “potentially destructive” — all terms discussed, infra. These are contentions rarely made with respect to elective share trusts in current wills.…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Matter of DurandNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Matter of ByrnesNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  3. In re the Estate of WittnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  4. In Re the Will of ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  5. In re MatthewsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of StalpNew York Surrogate's Court · 1974
  2. In re the Estate of WaltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API