Legal Opinion

Fenwick v. Oklahoma State Penitentiary

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 15, 1990No. 69691Published

1Opinion of the Court

792 P.2d 60 (1990)

James Richard FENWICK, Petitioner,

v.

OKLAHOMA STATE PENITENTIARY, State Insurance Fund, and Workers' Compensation Court, Respondents.

No. 69691.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

May 15, 1990.

Crowe & Dunlevy by Randal A. Sengel, Oklahoma City, for petitioner.

Fred Nicholas, Jr. and Gary L. Warden, State Ins. Fund, Oklahoma City, for respondent Ins. Carrier.

HODGES, Justice.

This case arose after James R. Fenwick (Claimant) sought workers' compensation for permanent partial disability. The Workers' Compensation Court found that Claimant had not suffered an accidental injury. The Oklahoma…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited116 opinions

  1. Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Thing v. La ChusaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Hood v. Texas Indemnity InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Spade v. Lynn & Boston RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  5. Fought v. Stuart C. Irby Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1988

111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API