Legal Opinion

Graham v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 20, 2011No. 22A01-1008-PC-392PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REHEARING

BARNES, Judge.

The State petitions for rehearing following our decision in Graham v. State, 941 N.E.2d 1091 (Ind.Ct.App.2011). The State does not challenge the ultimate outcome in our original opinion, i.e. remanding for further proceedings to readdress Graham’s claim of an illusory or involuntary plea and possibly his claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. It takes issue instead with comments we made regarding the creation and preservation of evidentiary records in post-conviction relief (“PCR”) proceedings. We grant rehearing to address the State’s concerns.

As…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Evans v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Graham v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Mitchell v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. State v. LimeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Douglas v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Adam Horton v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Juan Manzano v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. William Hinesley, III v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Brandon T. Black v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Hogan v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API