Legal Opinion

Marriage of Roel v. Roel

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 9, 1987No. C5-86-1934Published

1Opinion of the Court

406 N.W.2d 619 (1987)

In re the Marriage of Thomas C. ROEL, Petitioner, Respondent,

v.

Mary Ann ROEL, Appellant.

No. C5-86-1934.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

June 9, 1987.

Mark A. Fraase, Wegner, Fraase, Nordeng, & Johnson, Fargo, N.D., Herman F. Wegner, Moorhead, for respondent.

Maureen Holman, Serkland, Lundberg, Erickson, Marcil & McLean, Ltd., Fargo, N.D., for appellant.

Heard considered and decided by POPOVICH, C.J., and LANSING and RANDALL, JJ.

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

Mary Ann Roel appeals from a judgment of dissolution, claiming the trial court abused its discretion by refusing to award her…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Marriage of Rutten v. RuttenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Marriage of Erlandson v. ErlandsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Bogen v. BogenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Bollenbach v. BollenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  5. Marriage of Schmitz v. SchmitzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API