Marriage of Roel v. Roel
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
406 N.W.2d 619 (1987)
In re the Marriage of Thomas C. ROEL, Petitioner, Respondent,
v.
Mary Ann ROEL, Appellant.
No. C5-86-1934.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
June 9, 1987.
Mark A. Fraase, Wegner, Fraase, Nordeng, & Johnson, Fargo, N.D., Herman F. Wegner, Moorhead, for respondent.
Maureen Holman, Serkland, Lundberg, Erickson, Marcil & McLean, Ltd., Fargo, N.D., for appellant.
Heard considered and decided by POPOVICH, C.J., and LANSING and RANDALL, JJ.
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Mary Ann Roel appeals from a judgment of dissolution, claiming the trial court abused its discretion by refusing to award her…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Marriage of Rutten v. RuttenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Marriage of Erlandson v. ErlandsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Bogen v. BogenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Bollenbach v. BollenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Marriage of Schmitz v. SchmitzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.