Legal Opinion
In Re Sealed Case
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 6, 2009No. 07-5251PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge TATEL.
Opinion concurring in the judgment filed by Circuit Judge KAVANAUGH.
TATEL, Circuit Judge:
Appellant, a member of the Vermont Army National Guard, sued the Department of the Army, claiming that the Vermont Army National Guard released his personal information in violation of the Privacy Act. The parties agree that the Privacy Act protects state guardsmen *1048while on active federal duty. Appellant, however, was not on active federal duty at the time his personal information was released. For the reasons set forth below, we hold that the Privacy Act…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lane v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Martinez, Robert v. Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Perpich v. Department of DefenseSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Richard C. Bartel v. Federal Aviation Administration Richard C. Bartel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Nelson v. GeringerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Dick v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Association of Civilian Technicians, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
- Stirling v. Brown, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Stanford v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2014
- US EX REL. CONOVER v. AnthonyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.