Legal Opinion
Stirling v. Brown
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided January 4, 2018No. G053998PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FYBEL, ACTING P. J.
*1147INTRODUCTION
The California Military Whistleblower Protection Act, Military and Veterans Code section 56 ( Section 56 ), affords certain rights and protections to service members of the California National Guard who face actual or threatened adverse personnel actions in retaliation for reporting waste, fraud, abuse of authority, violation of law, or threats to the public health and safety. A service member may file an allegation that a prohibited personnel action has been taken. The allegation is filed with the state inspector general, who must expeditiously determine…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Cooley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re RosenkrantzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Manduley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Perpich v. Department of DefenseSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dwight Stirling v. Larry MinasianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- MCI Commc'ns Servs., Inc. v. Cal. Dep't of Tax & Fee Admin., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- DiRaffael v. Cal. Army Nat. GuardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
- Diraffael v. Cal. Army Nat'l Guard, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- MCI Communications etc. v. Cal. Dept. of Tax and Fee Admin.California Court of Appeal · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.