Ropfogel v. Enegren
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Abbott, J.:
The plaintiff, Leonard Ropfogel, appeals from an order holding that funds derived from the rental of real property which was subject to the right of redemption were not subject to garnishment while held by a receiver who was appointed by the trial court to prevent waste, pursuant to K.S.A. 1981 Supp. 60-2414(p).
The parties have stipulated that Ropfogel obtained a judgment ($250,000 plus interest and costs) against the defendants, Paul and June Enegren. June Enegren owned a number of parcels of land which were sold pursuant to writs of execution. Ropfogel purchased the properties at…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. LuginbillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
- State v. DumlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
- Fleming Company v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
- Southeast Kansas Landowners Ass'n v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
- Capitol Building & Loan Ass'n v. RossSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. BishopUtah Supreme Court · 1988
- Farmco, Inc. v. Explosive Specialists, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1984
- Mid Kansas Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. ZimmerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1988
- Farm Credit Bank of Wichita v. ZerrCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1996
- In Re SinkerDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.