Legal Opinion

United States v. Spenhoff

United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided January 17, 1995No. ACM 30729PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

GAMBOA, Judge:

Appellant was convicted, contrary to his pleas, by a military judge sitting as a general court-martial, of maiming a girl by burning *773her buttocks. Article 124, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 924 (1988). His approved sentence is a bad conduct discharge, confinement for 42 months, forfeiture of $500.00 pay per month for 42 months, and reduction to E-l. Appellant claims the evidence is legally and factually insufficient to support the findings of guilty and argues that his sentence is unduly severe. Finding neither argument persuasive, we affirm.

I. FACTS

On 8 October 1992,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. SnellingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. United States v. HealyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  3. People v. KeenanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. United States v. McGheeU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. OutinNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
  2. United States v. MorganArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API