Legal Opinion

Finn v. Railroad Commission

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 7, 1933No. 3485 KPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This matter is before a three-judge court upon motions to dismiss the amended bill of complaint and to dissolve the temporary restraining order in behalf of the several defendants, upon an order to show cause why an interlocutory injunction should not be issued, and upon the merits, the defendants having answered without waiving their rights under the motion to dismiss. While we believe that there is merit in the motion to dismiss and that it should be granted, the matter is also before us upon the merits, and the time of this court and of the litigants will be saved by a final disposition of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Frost & Frost Trucking Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Heron v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Napa Valley Electric Co. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Napa Valley Electric Co. v. Railroad Commission of CaliforniaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1919
  5. Wallace Ranch Water Co. v. Railroad Commission of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Consolidated Freightways, Inc. v. Railroad CommissionDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1941
  2. Duck v. Arkansas Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
  3. Lopez, Sr. v. CruzSuperior Court of Guam · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API