Legal Opinion

Freeman v. Sullivan

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 20, 1927No. Docket No. 3308PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

Action by the plaintiff for an accounting and to charge defendant with one-half of .losses incurred. The defendant had judgment, and the plaintiff appeals.

The complaint filed herein sets forth two alleged causes of action, one based upon an allegation that the plaintiff and defendant formed a partnership and conducted a partnership for the purpose of buying and selling beans. The second cause of action sets forth that the plaintiff and defendant engaged in a joint adventure, the purpose of which was to buy and sell beans. The second cause of action set forth in the complaint was dismissed…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Berthold v. GoldsmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
  2. Jones v. Title Guaranty Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Whitcomb v. ConverseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  4. Lyden v. Spohn-Patrick Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Vanderhurst, Sanborn, & Co. v. De WittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. De Rigne v. HartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API