Legal Opinion

Lumbermen's Insurance v. City of St. Paul

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 29, 1901No. Nos. 12,302—(196)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Action in tbe district court for Ramsey county' to recover the amount of an award assessed in condemnation proceedings. The case was tried before Kelly, J., who found in favor of defendants. From an order denying a motion for a new trial, plaintiffs appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.

In 1883 the city of St. Paul constructed a fill along East Seventh street running in an easterly direction through Wagener’s addition, and as part of the work the city constructed, and has ever since maintained, a culvert over Phalen creek, which was. running-through Wagener’s addition from a northerly in a southerly direction. In 1886 the owner of this addition, John Wagener, executed several mortgages upon the same, aggregating many thousands of dollars, and the plaintiffs are the purchasers upon foreclosure sale; the premises having been bid in for a large sum less than the amount of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Farnham v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  2. Moritz v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  3. Boutelle v. Minneapolis CitySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Eyre v. City of FaribaultSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  2. Palo v. RogersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  3. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  4. Ricker v. J. L. Owens Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  5. Holmstrom v. BarstadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API