Legal Opinion
Palo v. Rogers
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 25, 1933PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBanks, J.
In February, 1929, the city of Stamford instituted proceedings to establish a new building line on the east side of Bedford Street in that city in front of property acquired by the defendant Rogers pending those proceedings. The plaintiff Palo owns a first mortgage of $37,000 upon the property, the plaintiff Gruber a second mortgage of $17,000, and the plaintiffs Nanos a third mortgage of $7875. The board of estimate and appraisal made a report to the common council assessing damages in favor of Rogers, which the common council amended by striking out the assessment and assessing damages in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Tamm v. KelloggSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871
- Eyre v. City of FaribaultSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Sherwood v. City of LafayetteIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Manners v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
- Kaufman v. ValenteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- United Illuminating Co. v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Schwartz v. Town of HamdenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Colaluca v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- Sachem's Head Assn. v. LufkinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Albert J. Cadorette v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.