State v. Stephen F.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1DissentCastillo, Judge
{29} I respectfully dissent. While I agree that Rule 10-229 of the Children’s Court Rules is the correct rule to use for the dispositional portion of this case, I do not agree that automatic dismissal is the sanction to be imposed when a dispositional hearing is not recommenced within forty-five days from entry of the order committing a child to a facility for diagnostic purposes.
{30} The majority relies on two bases for their holding that dismissal is the proper sanction. First, they look to the history of the rule; second, they interpret the language of the rule as necessarily including the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. RiveraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
- Filimon Castillo Perez v. George E. Sullivan, Warden, and Attorney General, State of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- State v. TodiscoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000
- Board of Commissioners v. Las Cruces Sun-NewsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- In re Michael L.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.