Legal Opinion
Filimon Castillo Perez v. George E. Sullivan, Warden, and Attorney General, State of New Mexico
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 9, 1986No. 85-1842PublishedCited by 82 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.
Filimon Castillo Perez (“defendant”) appeals from an Order of the district court dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. He contends that a fifteen month delay between his guilty plea in state court on burglary charges, and sentencing following an habitual criminal proceeding violated his Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial. He further contends that delay in bringing the habitual criminal charge violated his Fifth Amendment right to due process. Those arguments were presented to and rejected by the New Mexico Court of Appeals, which affirmed…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Smith v. HooeySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- Wayne Paul Burkett v. Richard Cunningham, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Nelson-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Lupe GomezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Claudio Lugo, AKA Lugo Mano, Joel Logue-Lugo, Joel Lugo LukeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Roderick K. DirdenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.