Legal Opinion

Minneapolis Electric Lamp Co. v. Federal Holding Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 26, 1928No. 26,771PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Olsen, C.

Appeal by plaintiffs from an order denying their motion for a new trial.

While' there are additional parties, the. Minneapolis Electric Lamp Company will be hereinafter referred to as plaintiff and the Federal Holding Company as defendant.

Plaintiff brought this action to have the lease between plaintiff and defendant, hereinafter more particularly described, decreed terminated as of December 31, 1922, and to enjoin defendant from prosecuting an action at law in the municipal court to collect rent alleged due under said lease subsequent to the claimed termination thereof. Defendant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Swedish American National Bank of Minneapolis v. KoebernickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Maher v. Duluth Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  3. Martin v. Walter CourtneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  4. Voge v. PenneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  5. Citizens Bank Building v. L. & E. Wertheimer, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Engstrom v. FARMERS & BANKERS LIFE INSURANCE CO.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  2. Johnson v. Theo. Hamm Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  3. National Pole & Treating Co. v. GilkeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  4. SHORTLAND v. LarsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Maze v. Minneapolis Willys-Knight Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API