Legal Opinion
Rudolph v. Adamar of New Jersey, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 31, 2001No. CIV. A. 00-190PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ORLOFSKY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The pending motions before this Court require the consideration and resolution of several novel questions of law. First, the Court must decide whether the Defendant/Third-party Plaintiff, Adamar of New Jersey, d/b/a Tropicana Casino and Resort (“Tropicana”), has a right, either under federal common law or by statute, specifically, 42 U.S.C. § 1988, to seek contribution and indemnification from the State of New Jersey for any attorneys’ fees ultimately awarded to the Plaintiff against the Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff. Second, this Court must…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Gerard Cardenas v. Jon Massey James Rebo Robert Lipscher James Ciancia Deborah Poritz State of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Paula Maliandi v. Montclair State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Bennett v. City of Atlantic CityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2003
- Garcia v. Richard Stockton College of New JerseyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
- Figueroa v. City of CamdenDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.