Legal Opinion

In re Rodney M.

New York City Family Court

Decided January 22, 1986PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Carmen J. Cognetta, J.

Respondent has made a motion requesting that the petition in this matter be dismissed pursuant to Family Court Act § 332.1 (8), in that the presentment agency has not speedily prosecuted this case.

The relevant dates and reasons for adjournments are as follows:

June 5 — July 12 (36 days) — Initial appearance held on June 5; case adjourned to July 12 for motions.

July 12 — September 13 (63 days) — Motions decided on July 12; set down for September 13 for fact finding. Long adjournment due to the fact that court could not set a trial date until *929late August…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re Rodney J.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. People v. StantonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  3. People v. DarrahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  4. People v. PardnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  5. In re Steven C.New York City Family Court · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Vincent M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. In re Abdul Hashim S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. In re Gregory C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API