Legal Opinion

People v. Pardner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 9, 1982PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously reversed, motion granted and indictment dismissed. Memorandum: The motion to dismiss the indictment pursuant to CPL 30.30 should have been granted. The District Attorney failed to submit an affidavit answering the showing made by defendant that the Grand Jury minutes were not made available to the Trial Judge for more than nine months after the Judge granted defendant’s motion to inspect the Grand Jury minutes. In the absence of any excuse justifying the delay, the indictment must be dismissed (People v Darrah, 29 AD2d 816; People v Ferrara, 102 Misc 2d 253; People v…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. SaundersCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1975
  2. People v. FerraraCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1979
  3. People v. DarrahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. CruzNew York Supreme Court · 1984
  2. In re Rodney M.New York City Family Court · 1986
  3. People v. CorporanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. People v. HoweAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  5. People v. LanghornCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API