Groseclose v. Sutherland
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
This is an action on a promissory note in the principal sum of $300. Defendant in error was plaintiff below, and the parties will be referred to herein as in the trial court.
The note sued upon is dated September 4, 1940, and was due November 4, 1940. Suit was commenced December 2, 1940. The petition, as originally filed, did not include an allegation that the note had been returned for taxation and the taxes paid as provided in the intangible property tax law, Title 68, sec. 1515, O. S. 1941.
Defendant filed his answer, consisting of a general denial, a plea of payment, and an allegation that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Grieves v. State Ex Rel. County Atty.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Day & Whitt Furniture Co. v. Welbilt Appliance Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Smith v. Arrow Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Kahan v. SchonwaldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Sutherland v. GrosecloseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mayor v. BennettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
- Glen v. BuckSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- Davis v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
- Lewis v. BoiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- Lewis v. BoiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950