Wolfinbarger v. Stanton

Opinion of the Court by

Drury, Commissioner—

Affirming.

T. J. Wolfinbarger appeals because he was unsuccessful when he sued S. H. Stanton for $500.00’ damages to an automobile, and for $3,000.00 for personal injuries sustained in a collision which he alleged was due to the fault of Stanton. In his answer and counterclaim Stanton denies fault on his part, and alleges that the collision resulted from the fault of Wolfinbarger, and he asked for $500.00 damages to his car. A plat was used on the trial of this case, and the witnesses testified with reference to that plat. They do not make the cause…