Legal Opinion

United States v. Conquest

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided January 28, 1980No. ACM S24787PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

EARLY, Chief Judge:

Contrary to his pleas, the accused was convicted by a special court-martial, military judge alone, of larceny, in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C.A. § 921. The approved sentence extends to a bad conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for five days, a fine of $500.00, and in lieu of payment of the fine, to be further confined at hard labor for one month.

Appellate defense counsel invite our attention to the error asserted by the accused in his request for appellate representation and assign one error. As to the latter, we…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. United States v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. ReineckeU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  2. United States v. BaurU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API