State v. Hannon
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Chief Judge.
Dr. Jane Matteson was assistant principal at South Park High School at the time the victim made her allegations. She was called to testify as an expert for the State. The following statements constitute the objectionable portion of her testimony according to defendant.
[Prosecutor]: Based upon your personal dealings with [the victim] and your observations of her for over three years now; is that correct? Do you have an opinion satisfactory to yourself as to her truthfulness or untruthfulness?
[Dr. Matteson]: Yes, I do.
Q: Could you please tell us that opinion?
A: [The victim]…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Milton L. McCaskillCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- State v. AgualloSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. HeathSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. Chul Yun KimSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. HollowayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. CastanedaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- State v. DixonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. O'CONNORCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- State v. BettsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.