Legal Opinion

Snow v. United States Railroad Administration

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 8, 1924PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cochrane, P. J.:

Obviously a State Workmen’s Compensation Law is ineffectual against the Federal government without the consent of Congress. We are referred to no congressional enactment giving such consent except section 206 (d) of the Transportation Act (Act of Congress, approved February 28, 1920, chap. 91), which reads as follows: “ Actions, suits, proceedings, and reparation claims, of the character above described pending at the termination of Federal control shall not abate by reason of such termination, but may be prosecuted to final judgment, substituting the agent designated by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Claim of Solomone v. Degnon Contracting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  2. Matter of Casmey v. . George Parks' Sons Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. Matter of Lutz v. . Theo. P. Huffman Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Donoho v. Atlantic Basin Iron WorksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  2. Claim of Leslie v. Long Island RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  3. Claim of Messnick v. Kahn Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  4. Claim of Lanning v. Erie RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
  5. Claims of Babington v. Yellow Taxi Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API