Claim of Lanning v. Erie Railroad
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Soheuck, J. (dissenting).
I dissent and vote for reversal. Between decedent and this claimant, his widow, there is no privity, a term which “ denotes mutual or successive relationship to the same rights of property ” (1 Greenleaf on Evidence [15th ed.], § 189), for “ a proceeding under a claim for death benefits is not the same as a proceeding for compensation made by an employee who survives his injury but subsequently dies therefrom.” (Snow v. United States Railroad Administration, 209 App. Div. 308, affd. 239 N. Y. 528; cert. den. 266 U. S. 630.) Moreover, for the principle of res judicata…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- New York Central Railroad Company v. WinfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Utah Fuel Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1926
- Snow v. United States Railroad AdministrationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Matter of Snow v. United States Railroad AdministrationNew York Court of Appeals · 1924