Legal Opinion · Dissent

Claim of Lanning v. Erie Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 3, 1943Published

1Dissent

Soheuck, J. (dissenting).

I dissent and vote for reversal. Between decedent and this claimant, his widow, there is no privity, a term which “ denotes mutual or successive relationship to the same rights of property ” (1 Greenleaf on Evidence [15th ed.], § 189), for “ a proceeding under a claim for death benefits is not the same as a proceeding for compensation made by an employee who survives his injury but subsequently dies therefrom.” (Snow v. United States Railroad Administration, 209 App. Div. 308, affd. 239 N. Y. 528; cert. den. 266 U. S. 630.) Moreover, for the principle of res judicata…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. New York Central Railroad Company v. WinfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Utah Fuel Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Snow v. United States Railroad AdministrationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  4. Matter of Snow v. United States Railroad AdministrationNew York Court of Appeals · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API