Legal Opinion

Matter of Lutz v. . Theo. P. Huffman Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 14, 1921PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered January 13, 1921, unanimously affirming an award of the state industrial commission made under the Workmen’s Compensation Law.

Read the full summary

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered January 13, 1921, unanimously affirming an award of the state industrial commission made under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Claimant alleged that her husband, while in the employ of the defendant Huffman & Co., suffered three accidents, one in March and two in August, 1916. The husband, while living, filed claims for compensation but they were disallowed on the grounds that no accident was proven and that they were filed more than one year after the alleged…

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Hogan, Cardozo, Crane and Andrews, JJ. Absent: Pound, J.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Zechmann v. Canisteo Volunteer Fire DepartmentNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Snow v. United States Railroad AdministrationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API