Legal Opinion

Armbee Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 6, 1968No. C.D. 3278PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Watson, Judge:

The protest in this case involves an importation of certain plastic artificial flowers described on the invoice as “AP/37 Poinsettia Branch”, “AP/36 Poinsettia Spray”, and “AP/1 Poinsettia Spray”. It was stipulated that the involved articles are in chief value of plastic (R..3).

The merchandise in question was classified under item 748.20 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States and assessed with duty at the rate of 28 per centum ad valorem as artificial flowers, wholly or almost wholly of plastics. Plaintiffs contend that the imported articles are properly dutiable under…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Zunold Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  2. Edgar Allen Steel Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Zunold Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  2. Morris Friedman & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  3. Garza v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  4. Pacific Fast Mail, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  5. Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API