Legal Opinion

The Florida Bar v. Charnock

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 26, 1995No. 81857PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

661 So.2d 1207 (1995)

THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant,

v.

William T. CHARNOCK, III, Respondent.

No. 81857.

Supreme Court of Florida.

October 26, 1995.

John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director and John T. Berry, Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, and Carlos E. Torres, Bar Counsel, Orlando, for complainant.

James Martin Brown of the Law Offices of James Martin Brown, Brooksville, for respondent.

2Per curiam

This matter is before the Court on respondent's petition for review of a referee's report in a Florida Bar disciplinary proceeding. The referee recommended that respondent William T. Charnock III be suspended from the…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Concurrence.

3Cases cited11 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  2. The Florida Bar v. MacMillanSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  3. The Florida Bar v. LawlessSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
  4. The Florida Bar v. MieleSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  5. PELYCADO ONROEREND v. RuthenbergDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. PorterSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  2. The Florida Bar v. KassierSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
  3. The Florida Bar v. MauriceSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
  4. In Re RoyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  5. The Florida Bar v. PipkinsSupreme Court of Florida · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API