Legal Opinion

The Florida Bar v. Pipkins

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 26, 1998No. 89006PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

708 So.2d 953 (1998)

THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant,

v.

Royce Derrell PIPKINS, Respondent.

No. 89006.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 26, 1998.

John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, and John T. Berry, Staff Counsel, Tallahassee; and Eric M. Turner, Bar Counsel, Orlando, for Complainant.

Royce D. Pipkins, pro se, Altamonte Springs, for Respondent.

2Per curiam

We have for review the referee's report regarding alleged ethical breaches by Royce Derrell Pipkins. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 15, Fla. Const.

On January 12, 1995, this Court suspended Pipkins from the practice of law for sixty days and placed him on…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. BenchimolSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  2. The Florida Bar v. GlickSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
  3. The Florida Bar v. GreeneSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  4. The Florida Bar v. CharnockSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  5. The Florida Bar v. MillerSupreme Court of Florida · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. TemmerSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  2. The Florida Bar v. ShoureasSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  3. Florida Bar v. GrossoSupreme Court of Florida · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API