Legal Opinion
(PC) Harrell v. Simmons
District Court, E.D. California
Decided July 8, 2020No. 2:19-cv-01838Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSHUA NEIL HARRELL, No. 2:19-cv-01838-TLN-AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 ANTUAN SIMMONS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 This matter is before the Court pursuant to Plaintiff Joshua Neil Harrell’s (“Plaintiff”) 18 “Objections” to the magistrate judge’s order filed April 27, 2020 (ECF No. 19), which the Court 19 construes as a Motion for Reconsideration. (ECF No. 20.) For the reasons set forth below, 20 Plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED. 21 / / / 22 / / / 23 / / / 24 / / / 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 / / / 28 / / / 1 I.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kern-Tulare Water District v. City of BakersfieldDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1986
- Kern-Tulare Water District v. City of BakersfieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Craig John Maisonville, and James M. Dombroski v. F2 America, Inc. F2 International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Thomas Burdick, Estate of Perrin v. Burdick v. Commissioner Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.