Legal Opinion

Smith v. Cowart

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 25, 2011No. 1090048PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURDOCK, Justice.

Nathan Smith and Dale D. Smith appeal from a judgment entered by the Macon Circuit Court in their action against H. Buford Cowart, Debbie Cowart d/b/a DBM Enterprises, and Herman Cowart (collectively “the Cowarts”). We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

I. Facts and Procedural History

In 1994, the Smiths and Buford Cowart formed Heartland Products, Inc. (“Heartland”); Heartland engaged in a landscaping business based in Macon County. The Smiths owned 49 percent of the corporation; Buford Cowart owned 51 percent of the corporation. The Smiths alleged that Heartland…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ex Parte DowlingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Selby v. MoneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  3. Smith v. WILCOX CTY. BD. OF EDUC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  4. Jones v. Merrill LynchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  5. Ex Parte LangSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Eugene Milton Clemons, II v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
  2. Dreding v. KruseCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2013
  3. Frank Gillis, M.D. v. Joey Frazier, as of the Estate of Florine BryantSupreme Court of Alabama · 2014
  4. Frank Gillis, M.D. v. Joey Frazier, as of the Estate of Florine BryantSupreme Court of Alabama · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API