Legal Opinion

Hamblen County v. Cain

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1905PublishedCited by 8 opinions

PROM HAMBLEN. Appeal from Chancery Court of Hamblen County. — ■ Hugh G. Kyle/ Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Neil

This action- was brought December 28, 1904, in the chancery court of Hamblen county, to recover of the defendant $670.40, fees for witnesses, officers,, etc., left in his hands uncalled for, that had accumulated prior to the year 1878, during the eight years of his service as clerk of the circuit court of the county next before the said year 1878. The bill charges that these moneys are still in his hands. A demurrer was filed, making the *281defenses of the ten-year statute of limitations, provided by Shannon’s Oode, section 4173, the statute of limita.tions of six years, the presumption of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hughes v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Johnson v. HudsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Knoxville v. GervinTennessee Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Boro v. HidellTennessee Supreme Court · 1909
  3. County of Johnson v. United States Gypsum Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1984
  4. Wood v. Cannon CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1942
  5. Kelley v. Metropolitan County Board of EducationDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API