Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Hudson

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1896PublishedCited by 4 opinions

FROM BENTON. Appeal from Chancery Court of Benton County. A. G. Hawkins, Cb.

1Opinion of the Court

John T. Allen, Sp. J.

This is an agreed case, by which the parties, in accordance with §§ 4187, 4188 of M. & Y. Code, submitted the facts upon which the controversy depends, to the Chancery Court of Benton County, in which county the defendant resides. The defendant is Clerk and Master of the Chancery Court of said county, and has been such for three years. The complainant is the attorney appointed by James A. Harris, Comptroller of the State, under Ch. 137 of the Acts of 1895, the object being to clothe said attorney with the powers heretofore vested in the Judge or Chairman of the County…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Broatch v. MooresNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Keebler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1970
  3. Hamblen County v. CainTennessee Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Kilgore v. Ake Coal Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API