Legal Opinion

United States v. Roa

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided July 18, 1985No. ACM 24730PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

HODGSON, Chief Judge:

Following mixed pleas, the appellant was convicted in a bench trial of burglary, larceny, housebreaking, making a false oath and multiple derelictions of duty in violation of Articles 129, 121, 134 and 92, U.C. M.J., 10 U.S.C.A. The approved sentence extends to a dishonorable discharge, confinement for four years, forfeiture of $397.00 per month for 48 months and reduction to airman basic. Appellate defense counsel have asserted five errors. While none require remedial action, an extended discussion of some is warranted.

I

The appellant, citing O'Callahan v. Parker,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Schlesinger v. CouncilmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. O'Callahan v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Relford v. Commandant, US Disciplinary Barracks, Fort LeavenworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. RoaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  2. United States v. BenedictU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1985
  3. United States v. HerringU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1985
  4. United States v. ReppU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1986
  5. United States v. CaylorU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API