Legal Opinion
United States v. Repp
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
Decided October 6, 1986No. ACM 25211PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
HODGSON, Chief Judge:
The case before us is one of first impression and involves evidence obtained from a body view. The applicable evidentiary rule states:
RULE 312. BODY VIEWS AND INTRUSIONS(a) GENERAL RULE. Evidence obtained from body views and intrusions conducted in accordance with this rule is admissible at trial when relevant and not otherwise inadmissible under these rules.(b) VISUAL EXAMINATION OF THE BODY
******(2) INVOLUNTARY. An involuntary display of the unclothed body, including a visual examination of body cavities, may be required only if conducted in a reasonable fashion…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Security And Law Enforcement Employees v. CareyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Strickland v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- United States v. FerriCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- United States v. KinaneUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- United States v. RosatoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. SloanU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. TallonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
- Repp v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991