Legal Opinion

Wisconsin Electric Power Co. v. City of Milwaukee

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1956PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The amended complaint does not differ in any material respect from the original complaint, nor does appellant contend that it does. It presents to us the identical issue which we considered and determined in Wisconsin Electric Power Co. v. Milwaukee (1953), 263 Wis. 111, 56 N. W. (2d) 784. The reason for this appeal appears to be that, since the first one, the supreme court of the United States has considered once more the sufficiency of notice given by publication and in New York v. New York, N. H. & H. R. Co. (1953), 344 U. S. 293, 73 Sup. Ct. 299, 97 L. Ed. 333, has affirmed and somewhat…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. City of New York v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. McGovern v. EckhartWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Wisconsin Electric Power Co. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Pick Industries, Inc. v. Gebhard-Berghammer, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re HuieNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. Meadowbrook Manor, Inc. v. City of St. Louis ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. Konantz v. SteinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  4. Pratt v. Water District No. 79Washington Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Dohrmann Co. v. Security Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API